Recent studies describe constitutionalism and pluralism as antithetical options and often speak of the former as something holistic and closed, with pluralism to be preferred, at the postnational level, because of the flexibility and openness that it could ensure. The aim of this chapter is to offer a reflection on the relationship between openness and constitutionalism by looking at some constitutional experiences, primarily (but not exclusively) the Italian constituent process, taken as interesting case studies to explore the origin of constitutional openness.
Overcoming False Dichotomies: Constitutionalism and Pluralism in European and International Studies
Giuseppe Martinico
2018-01-01
Abstract
Recent studies describe constitutionalism and pluralism as antithetical options and often speak of the former as something holistic and closed, with pluralism to be preferred, at the postnational level, because of the flexibility and openness that it could ensure. The aim of this chapter is to offer a reflection on the relationship between openness and constitutionalism by looking at some constitutional experiences, primarily (but not exclusively) the Italian constituent process, taken as interesting case studies to explore the origin of constitutional openness.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Belov_Global Constitutionalism and Its Challenges to Westphalian Constitutional Law, 03.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print/Accepted manuscript
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
295.11 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
295.11 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
