Following several decisions on the interpretation of the right of communication to the public in the digital environment, the CJEU clarified that embedding a protected work in a website constitutes a copyright violation if it circumvents effective technological protection measures. The systematic and practical significance of the judgement in Case C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst promises to bring legal certainty into the realm of online uses of creative content and its constant and future evolution.
The CJEU’s take on unauthorized framing of online content: (only) if technologically precluded, then prohibited
Giulia Priora
2021-01-01
Abstract
Following several decisions on the interpretation of the right of communication to the public in the digital environment, the CJEU clarified that embedding a protected work in a website constitutes a copyright violation if it circumvents effective technological protection measures. The systematic and practical significance of the judgement in Case C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst promises to bring legal certainty into the realm of online uses of creative content and its constant and future evolution.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
