From Promusicae to date, the fair balance test has evolved into an articulated, sector-specific doctrine, but loopholes still affect its reliability and consistency over time. Waiting for the CJEU’s boundary-setting responses in Funke Medien, Pelham and Spiegel Online, this article sketches the evolution of the fair balance case law, draws a conceptual map schematizing the key elements of the doctrine, identifies its gaps, and illustrates how the CJEU can fix them.

A Decade of Fair Balance Doctrine, and How to Fix It: Copyright versus Fundamental Rights before the CJEU from Promusicae to Funke Medien, Pelham and Spiegel Online

C. Sganga
2019-01-01

Abstract

From Promusicae to date, the fair balance test has evolved into an articulated, sector-specific doctrine, but loopholes still affect its reliability and consistency over time. Waiting for the CJEU’s boundary-setting responses in Funke Medien, Pelham and Spiegel Online, this article sketches the evolution of the fair balance case law, draws a conceptual map schematizing the key elements of the doctrine, identifies its gaps, and illustrates how the CJEU can fix them.
2019
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sganga_A decade of fair balance doctrine and how to fix it_EIPR_11_2019.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Estratto della rivistsa
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print/Accepted manuscript
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 766.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
766.16 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11382/528530
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
social impact