ill the last decade of the 20th century we, Western scholars and citizens, were almost used to take for granted ‘thick’ definitions about the necessary conditions to ascribe a regime to the family of “representative democracy”: to tackle a polity of this kind, for a long time we have commonly depicted its features in terms of some, very demanding, and not explicit, axiological assumptions. Nowadays, some of those assumptions are vehemently questioned and even dismantled, being challenged by a multilateral and diversified front of adversaries: which includes populist ideologies and movements, on one side, and deep institutional crisis, on the other. Assuming that, it is even more urgent not to give up: we cannot in any case “get rid of” the critical way of reasoning. Moreover, this endeavor is even more urgent in hard times. Therefore, some of the ‘thick’ and demanding democratic assumptions, and their opposite concepts, will be clarified and debunked in the core of this contribution. The following paragraphs aim at building up a minimal and partial index, a seminal step for rewriting in the future at least some lemmas of a democratic lexicon. This lexicon aims to identify the necessary conditions for a vital and inclusive democratic government to flourish and last over time.

A Lexicon on Inclusive Democracy: freedom, self-determination, rights. Per un lessico della Democrazia Inclusiva:libertà, autodeterminazione, diritti

Barbara Henry
2021-01-01

Abstract

ill the last decade of the 20th century we, Western scholars and citizens, were almost used to take for granted ‘thick’ definitions about the necessary conditions to ascribe a regime to the family of “representative democracy”: to tackle a polity of this kind, for a long time we have commonly depicted its features in terms of some, very demanding, and not explicit, axiological assumptions. Nowadays, some of those assumptions are vehemently questioned and even dismantled, being challenged by a multilateral and diversified front of adversaries: which includes populist ideologies and movements, on one side, and deep institutional crisis, on the other. Assuming that, it is even more urgent not to give up: we cannot in any case “get rid of” the critical way of reasoning. Moreover, this endeavor is even more urgent in hard times. Therefore, some of the ‘thick’ and demanding democratic assumptions, and their opposite concepts, will be clarified and debunked in the core of this contribution. The following paragraphs aim at building up a minimal and partial index, a seminal step for rewriting in the future at least some lemmas of a democratic lexicon. This lexicon aims to identify the necessary conditions for a vital and inclusive democratic government to flourish and last over time.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
heitorpagliaro-LAHRS+-+Barbara+Henry (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 566.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
566.54 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11382/538750
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
social impact