Abstract: Drawing on a recent decision by the Court of Cassation on the crime of facilitation of irregular migration – in particular, in the context of “ethnic networks” – the article addresses the issue of humanitarian and solidarity support to migrants. Against a widespread opinion in scholarship, it argues that rescue and humanitarian actions shall be deemed legitimate because they do not amount to the constituent elements of the offence of migrant smuggling as the scope of the criminal provision explicitly excludes them.

Supporto organizzato e supporto individuale a migranti non autorizzati. Incrocio pericoloso tra favoreggiamento della migrazione, associazione per delinquere, non punibilità "umanitaria"

di martino
2023-01-01

Abstract

Abstract: Drawing on a recent decision by the Court of Cassation on the crime of facilitation of irregular migration – in particular, in the context of “ethnic networks” – the article addresses the issue of humanitarian and solidarity support to migrants. Against a widespread opinion in scholarship, it argues that rescue and humanitarian actions shall be deemed legitimate because they do not amount to the constituent elements of the offence of migrant smuggling as the scope of the criminal provision explicitly excludes them.
2023
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2023DIR IMM CITT.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print/Submitted manuscript
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 972.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
972.11 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11382/564792
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
social impact