This study explores how digital transformation (DT) is operationalized and measured within Health System Performance Assessments (HSPAs) across European Union (EU) countries. By conducting a documentary analysis of national HSPAs through the READ approach, we identified 11 EU countries that include digital health metrics and extracted a total of 93 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). These indicators were systematically categorized using the Input-Process-Output-Outcome (IPOO) framework and clustered into four deductively derived domains and corresponding sub-domains. Building on this empirical foundation, we propose a novel conceptual framework that integrates theoretical and practical dimensions of DT monitoring. The framework assigns representative KPIs to each IPOO phase and highlights critical but currently under-monitored areas. Despite notable progress in areas such as electronic health records, telemedicine, and digital service usage, the findings reveal persistent challenges. Furthermore, significant variability exists across countries in the adoption and computability of DT indicators. By providing a structured model and a comprehensive pool of indicators, this study contributes to both academic literature and practical policymaking. It supports efforts to guide DT measurement across healthcare systems while maintaining the flexibility needed to adapt to diverse national contexts. Future research should explore the evolving integration of DT metrics and continue to address gaps that hinder effective performance monitoring and policy development in healthcare digitalization.

Supporting the digital transformation journey through monitoring systems in healthcare. A comparative analysis of European empirical approaches through an adaptation of the IPOO framework

Alessandro Vinci
Primo
Conceptualization
;
Andrea Vandelli
Secondo
Formal Analysis
;
Alessia Caputo
Penultimo
Formal Analysis
;
Milena Vainieri
Ultimo
Supervision
2025-01-01

Abstract

This study explores how digital transformation (DT) is operationalized and measured within Health System Performance Assessments (HSPAs) across European Union (EU) countries. By conducting a documentary analysis of national HSPAs through the READ approach, we identified 11 EU countries that include digital health metrics and extracted a total of 93 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). These indicators were systematically categorized using the Input-Process-Output-Outcome (IPOO) framework and clustered into four deductively derived domains and corresponding sub-domains. Building on this empirical foundation, we propose a novel conceptual framework that integrates theoretical and practical dimensions of DT monitoring. The framework assigns representative KPIs to each IPOO phase and highlights critical but currently under-monitored areas. Despite notable progress in areas such as electronic health records, telemedicine, and digital service usage, the findings reveal persistent challenges. Furthermore, significant variability exists across countries in the adoption and computability of DT indicators. By providing a structured model and a comprehensive pool of indicators, this study contributes to both academic literature and practical policymaking. It supports efforts to guide DT measurement across healthcare systems while maintaining the flexibility needed to adapt to diverse national contexts. Future research should explore the evolving integration of DT metrics and continue to address gaps that hinder effective performance monitoring and policy development in healthcare digitalization.
2025
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0040162525003713-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: PDF Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons (selezionare)
Dimensione 875.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
875.04 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11382/581232
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
social impact